23 Mar 2009 @ 7:24 PM 

Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 23 Mar 2009 @ 07:24 PM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 23 Mar 2009 @ 7:12 PM 

Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 23 Mar 2009 @ 07:12 PM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 23 Mar 2009 @ 3:14 PM 

Just S of Clearwater Rd & West St.

Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 23 Mar 2009 @ 03:14 PM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 23 Mar 2009 @ 10:48 AM 
Well, I’m nothing for drawing…but here’s something pretty impressive. Look at the dewpoints (the bottom number in each stacked pair) east of the line I drew and west of the line. Our dryline is setting up, nice and clear, right along US 83.



Meanwhile, mid-50′s dewpoints are now to OKC, in a narrow tongue along I-35. Visible satellite shows moisture streaming N.

The clouds overhead (and to our south) are showing the moisture streaming in. Take a look at the herringbone patterns in two locations….the lower clouds in SE Oklahoma, which show the southerly surface-level winds, and the higher clouds in Central KS, which show the WSW upper-level winds.

The edge of the clearing is not far to our west — just west of Pratt, at the moment. Remains to be seen how long it will take for that to erode and give us some additional instability.
Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 23 Mar 2009 @ 10:48 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 23 Mar 2009 @ 6:13 AM 
No, really, I mean it. These two graphics show some derived parameters from the RUC model, as predicted for 4pm CDT. The first one is based on research by Jon Davies.

[Edit: I linked both graphics incorrectly...should have uploaded them instead...these graphics are changing every time they are updates, so they are likely to not show what I'm talking about by the time you read this. As I write this edit, they are actually a bit higher values, for 7pm, than they were for 4pm.]

This one is based on some parameters that have more to do with larger tornadoes. Certainly nothing amazing, but definitely worth staying close to home for.

Pros: plenty of shear to work with, and from all indications the dry line will still be fairly sharp. The NAM shows a tongue of warmer surface temperatures right west of I-35 at 4pm, which tells me we’ll get the clearing we need for some instability.

Cons: instability is still mis-placed from shear, though the two are much closer than on previous model runs. Moisture return…as I write this, the 60′s are just about to, or in some cases across, the Red River. If we can get just a tad more SE component to the wind, and if things will slow down just a couple of hours, we could get the moisture here just at the right time.

Yeah, that’s a lot of if’s. My call: damaging wind/hail within 25 miles of Wichita, larger tornadoes will hold off until dark and be a bit east of here, but I would not be at all surprised with a tornado warning during the 5-6:30 timeframe in Wichita. NWS said yesterday this bore a lot of resemblance to 3/7, when we had the weak twisters just south of Hutch. I’d place todays 30-40 miles south of there.

Guess we’ll see, eh?

Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 23 Mar 2009 @ 06:13 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 22 Mar 2009 @ 8:32 AM 
Looks like the chase may be a bit closer-in than I originally thought. Not seeing a lot of tornado risk, but plenty of garden-variety to moderate severe weather. Target triangle right now is Medicine Lodge to Great Bend to Wichita. Looks like it will be close enough to wait to pull the trigger on an exact target until early afternoon tomorrow. More later in the day, after the 12z models are out.
Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 22 Mar 2009 @ 08:32 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 21 Mar 2009 @ 11:26 AM 
Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 21 Mar 2009 @ 11:26 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 21 Mar 2009 @ 10:58 AM 
SPC’s Day3 Probabilistic Outlook

Two choices where to play on Monday: cold-core setup in northern Kansas/Southern Nebraska and a more traditional setup in southern Kansas/Northern Oklahoma. I don’t have good luck with cold-core setups — still don’t understand the dynamics well enough to target. Plus the models are showing the southern target may adjust east of where I’d though, making it an easy hour or so drive to a target, and giving the ability to just follow the storms home.

Down side of that: the cell phone signal/data problem along the KS/OK line. Fortunately, the target looks to be between the worst state line signal problem areas (which are east of I-35 and west of US 281), so hopefully data won’t be as significant a problem as it was at times the last chase.

I have no doubt we’ll be looking at severe weather sometime after peak heating. Based on the models, I’m not so hot on the tornado prospects, as it seems instability and shear are displaced from one another at the critical times. For example, best shear on this morning’s runs looked to be in the Enid area, while better instability was east of I-35.

My feeling at this point is that we’ll have some decent storms through about the same time frame as the previous chase. The tornado risk may pick up a bit shortly after sunset, compared to the daylight hours. I’m going to change the routing to my initial target area to preserve a few more options, and the target itself will likely shift to the Enid area.

Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 21 Mar 2009 @ 10:58 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 20 Mar 2009 @ 6:56 AM 
Now that Monday is starting to come into the view of the NAM model, I’m getting a better feeling. As I write this, the critical time frame (7pm Monday) is still +90 hours, and not on the NAM. But at +84 (1pm Monday), things look a little juicier than the GFS had been showing — 60 dewpoints somwehat N of the Red River rather than still S of Dallas — and with a slightly more backed (southeasterly, instead of southerly) wind in the 850 layer.

I’m still comfortable with the US183/283 corridor, probably in north central OK.

Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 20 Mar 2009 @ 06:56 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized
 19 Mar 2009 @ 7:17 AM 
This is just the result of a quick scan of one model — the GFS 114hr (0z Tuesday, or 7pm CDT Monday) forecast, along with reading several AFDs and HWO’s this morning. If things hold, and I have every reason to believe they will, we’d be looking at a target area roughly bounded by a line from near DDC to Woodward to Mangum or Hobart, to OKC and ICT, back to DDC. Woodward and vicinity jumps out at me at the moment.
Posted By: sroberts
Last Edit: 19 Mar 2009 @ 07:17 AM

EmailPermalinkComments Off
Tags
Categories: Uncategorized

 Last 50 Posts
 Back
Change Theme...
  • Users » 2
  • Posts/Pages » 116
  • Comments » 6
Change Theme...
  • VoidVoid « Default
  • LifeLife
  • EarthEarth
  • WindWind
  • WaterWater
  • FireFire
  • LightLight

Live Tracker



    No Child Pages.

Chase Log



    No Child Pages.